Alcoholic Liver Disease/Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Index at Diagnosis Is Associated with All-Cause Mortality during Follow-Up in Patients with Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis.

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a new index related to chronic liver disease, the alcoholic liver disease/nonalcoholic fatty liver disease index (ANI) at diagnosis, is associated with all-cause mortality during follow-up in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). Materials and Methods: In this study, we included 270 patients with AAV. ANI was calculated using the following equation: ANI = -58.5 + 0.637 (adjusted mean corpuscular volume) + 3.91 (adjusted aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase) - 0.406 (body mass index) + 6.35 (if male sex). All-cause mortality was defined as death from any cause during follow-up. Results: The median age of the 270 patients with AAV was 61.0 years (34.4% male and 66.6% female). The median ANI was significantly higher in deceased patients than in surviving patients. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, ANI at diagnosis exhibited a statistically significant area under the curve for all-cause mortality during follow-up, and its cut-off was determined to be -0.59. Patients with ANI at diagnosis ≥ -0.59 exhibited a significantly higher risk for all-cause mortality and a significantly lower cumulative patient survival rate than those without. In the multivariable Cox analysis, ANI at diagnosis ≥ -0.59, together with age at diagnosis, was independently associated with all-cause mortality. Conclusions: This study is the first to demonstrate the predictive potential of ANI at diagnosis for all-cause mortality during follow-up in AAV patients without significant chronic liver diseases.

COVID-19 in Individuals with Chronic Liver Diseases.

Patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD) were considered to be in peril during the initial stages of the Coronavirus disease (Covid-19) pandemic. Progression of the course of the pandemic, however indicated that risk of severe disease and mortality differed, based on the cause of the hepatic disease. Patients suffering from Alcoholic liver disease or liver cirrhosis were confirmed to be at an increased risk by numerous studies, while that was not the case for HBV affected individuals and liver transplant recipients. The grade of liver fibrosis seemed to be the decisive factor for the severity of Covid-19 infection in the case of HCV infected individuals. Results are conflicting in the case of patients with metabolic- associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and insufficient in those with autoimmune liver disease.

Review article: Current indications and selection criteria for early liver transplantation in severe alcohol-associated hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is a severe inflammatory form of alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) that carries a high mortality rate. Early liver transplantation for severe AH is increasingly available. However, specific criteria for referral and selection remain a subject of debate. AIMS: To provide a narrative review of the natural history, diagnostic criteria and indications for referral for early liver transplantation for severe AH. METHODS: We searched PubMed for articles published through August 2023. Key search terms were 'alcoholic hepatitis,' 'alcohol-associated hepatitis,' 'abstinence,' 'alcohol relapse,' and 'liver transplantation.' RESULTS: Previously, a six-month period of alcohol abstinence was required before patients with ALD were considered for liver transplantation. However, studies in recent years have demonstrated that, among carefully selected patients, patients who received early transplants have much higher survival rates than patients with similarly severe disease who did not undergo transplants (77% vs. 23%). Despite these successes, early liver transplantation remains controversial, as these patients have typically not undergone treatment for alcohol use disorder, with the ensuing risk of returning to alcohol use. CONCLUSIONS: While early liver transplantation for AH has survival benefits, many patients would not have received treatment for alcohol use disorder. An integrated approach to evaluating candidacy for early liver transplantation is needed.

Treatment of alcohol use disorder in patients with alcohol-associated liver disease: Innovative approaches and a call to action.

Alcohol-associated liver disease is currently the leading cause of liver transplantation and liver deaths both in Europe and the United States. Efficacious treatments exist for alcohol use disorder, but they are seldomly prescribed for patients who need them. Besides, the presence of liver cirrhosis can complicate pharmacological treatment choices. In this review, we discuss established and innovative treatment strategies to treat unhealthy alcohol use in patients with alcohol-associated liver disease. We also describe the experience of our own institutions, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol in Badalona (Spain) and Yale-New Haven Health and Yale Medicine (Connecticut. United States of America).

Cerebral venous thrombosis presented with symmetrical crescent-shaped intracranial hemorrhage in alcoholic liver disease: Case reports.

RATIONALE: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a relatively uncommon but fatal disease. It can be caused by a variety of hereditary or acquired thrombotic diseases. Initial presentation with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in CVT is rare but can further complicate the therapeutic measures and prognosis. Cases of CVT presented with ICH in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) have not been described in the literature, and it might be related with hemostatic abnormalities in ALD patients. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report 2 cases of men admitted to our hospital who were diagnosed with CVT but initially presented with symmetrical crescent-shaped ICH; both of them were ALD patients. DIAGNOSES: Cerebral imaging revealed extended CVT in both cases. The first case was a 64-year-old man with ALD deteriorated with unconsciousness and convulsions; computed tomography showed symmetrical crescent-shaped ICH in the right temporal lobe, and magnetic resonance venography revealed CVT. Another 50-year-old man with ALD complained about dizziness and weakness of his right limbs; computed tomography revealed symmetrical crescent-shaped ICH in bilateral parietal and occipital lobes, and magnetic resonance venography revealed CVT. INTERVENTIONS: The first patient was referred to the endovascular thrombectomy. Both of them were treated with anticoagulation treatment. OUTCOMES: Favorable outcomes were observed in both patients. LESSONS: Symmetrical or multiple crescent-shaped ICH requires a high suspicion in the diagnosis of CVT; even with hemorrhage, it is still important to initiate anticoagulation therapy promptly. The crescent-shaped ICH might be a new sign for CVT, and further studies are needed in the underlying mechanisms of ALD and potential thrombophilia.

COVID-19, Possible Hepatic Pathways and Alcohol Abuse-What Do We Know up to 2023?

The pandemic period due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) revolutionized all possible areas of global health. Significant consequences were also related to diverse extrapulmonary manifestations of this pathology. The liver was found to be a relatively common organ, beyond the respiratory tract, affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Multiple studies revealed the essential role of chronic liver disease (CLD) in the general outcome of coronavirus infection. Present concerns in this field are related to the direct hepatic consequences caused by COVID-19 and pre-existing liver disorders as risk factors for the severe course of the infection. Which mechanism has a key role in this phenomenon-previously existing hepatic disorder or acute liver failure due to SARS-CoV-2-is still not fully clarified. Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) constitutes another not fully elucidated context of coronavirus infection. Should the toxic effects of ethanol or already developed liver cirrhosis and its consequences be perceived as a causative or triggering factor of hepatic impairment in COVID-19 patients? In the face of these discrepancies, we decided to summarize the role of the liver in the whole picture of coronavirus infection, paying special attention to ALD and focusing on the pathological pathways related to COVID-19, ethanol toxicity and liver cirrhosis.

[Epidemiological characteristics of inpatients with liver failure at the Beijing You'an Hospital from 2012 to 2021].

Objective: To elucidate the epidemiological characteristics and changing trends of liver failure in order to provide evidence-based strategies for prevention and treatment. Methods: The epidemiological information of inpatients with liver failure admitted and treated at Beijing You'an Hospital from 2012 to 2021 was retrospectively collected. The trend test was used to analyze age, gender, as well as the year-by-year changes in the underlying acute and chronic etiology of acute liver failure (ALF), sub-acute liver failure (SALF), acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), and chronic liver failure (CLF). Results: During the study period, information on a total of 8512 inpatients, aged 51.3±13.5 years and mainly male (71.9%) with liver failure, was collected. The highest to lowest proportions of liver failure types were ACLF 4 023 (47.3%), CLF 3 571(42.0%), SALF 670 (7.9%), and ALF 248 (2.9%). The top five causes of liver failure in the overall population, accounting for 87.6% of the total, were hepatitis B 3 199 (37.58%), alcoholic liver disease 2 237 (26.28%), cryptogenic liver disease 906(10.61%), hepatitis B + alcoholic liver disease 603 (7.08%), drugs 488 (5.73%), The top three etiologies of patients with different types of liver failure were acute etiologies for acute liver failure (ALF), followed by drugs 107 (43.1%), hepatitis B 47(19.0%), and unknown etiology 36 (14.5%); sub-acute liver failure (SALF), followed by drugs 381(56.9%), unknown etiology 106 (15.8%), and sepsis 56 (8.4%); and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), followed by drugs 2 092(52.0%), alcoholic liver disease 813(20.2%), and cryptogenic liver disease 398(9.9%); and chronic etiologies for chronic liver failure (CLF), followed by alcoholic liver disease 1 410(39.5%), hepatitis B 1 028(28.8%), and cryptogenic liver disease 364(10.2%). Longitudinal analysis showed that the average age of patients with liver failure increased year by year, but the sex ratio trend did not change significantly, with male patients predominating throughout. The proportion of drug-induced liver failure in patients with ALF and SALF increased year by year, and the difference in the trend test was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The proportion of patients with chronic etiologies of ACLF and CLF decreased year by year among hepatitis B, while the proportion of alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune liver disease, and cryptogenic liver disease increased year by year (the difference was statistically significant, P < 0.05). Conclusion: The etiological spectrum of liver failure is changing in our country. Although hepatitis B is still the main cause of liver failure, its proportion shows a decreasing trend year by year, with the exception of ACLF, which is no longer the primary etiology of other types of liver failure, while drug-induced liver disease, alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune liver disease, and cryptogenic liver disease are increasing year by year and will become the focus of liver disease prevention and treatment in the future.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease.

ABSTRACT: Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is the most common cause of advanced hepatic disease and frequent indication for liver transplantation worldwide. With harmful alcohol use as the primary risk factor, increasing alcohol use over the past decade has resulted in rapid growth of the ALD-related healthcare burden. The spectrum of ALD ranges from early asymptomatic liver injury to advanced disease with decompensation and portal hypertension. Compared with those with other etiologies of liver disease, patients with ALD progress faster and more often present at an advanced stage. A unique phenotype of advanced disease is alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) presenting with rapid onset or worsening of jaundice, and acute on chronic liver failure in severe forms conveying a 1-month mortality risk of 20%-50%. The model for end stage disease score is the most accurate score to stratify AH severity (>20 defined as severe disease). Corticosteroids are currently the only available therapeutic with proven efficacy for patients with severe AH, providing survival benefit at 1 month in 50%-60% of patients. Abstinence of alcohol use, a crucial determinant of long-term outcomes, is challenging to achieve in ALD patients with concurrent alcohol use disorder (AUD). As patients with ALD are rarely treated for AUD, strategies are needed to overcome barriers to AUD treatment in patients with ALD and to promote a multidisciplinary integrated care model with hepatology, addiction medicine providers, and social workers to comprehensively manage the dual pathologies of liver disease and of AUD. Liver transplantation, a definitive treatment option in patients with advanced cirrhosis, should be considered in selected patients with AH, who are unresponsive to medical therapy and have a low risk of relapse to posttransplant alcohol use. Level of evidence and strength of recommendations were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations system. This guideline was developed under the American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee.

Management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome in patients with alcohol-associated liver disease.

Alcohol-associated liver disease is a common and severe sequela of excessive alcohol use; effective treatment requires attention to both liver disease and underlying alcohol use disorder (AUD). Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) can be dangerous, is a common barrier to AUD recovery, and may complicate inpatient admissions for liver-related complications. Hepatologists can address these comorbid conditions by learning to accurately stage alcohol-associated liver disease, identify AUD using standardized screening tools (eg, Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test), and assess risk for and symptoms of AWS. Depending on the severity, alcohol withdrawal often merits admission to a monitored setting, where symptom-triggered administration of benzodiazepines based on standardized scoring protocols is often the most effective approach to management. For patients with severe liver disease, selection of benzodiazepines with less dependence on hepatic metabolism (eg, lorazepam) is advisable. Severe alcohol withdrawal often requires a "front-loaded" approach with higher dosing, as well as intensive monitoring. Distinguishing between alcohol withdrawal delirium and HE is important, though it can be difficult, and can be guided by differentiating clinical characteristics, including time to onset and activity level. There is little data on the use of adjuvant medications, including anticonvulsants, dexmedetomidine, or propofol, in this patient population. Beyond the treatment of AWS, inpatient admission and outpatient hepatology visits offer opportunities to engage in planning for ongoing management of AUD, including initiation of medications for AUD and referral to additional recovery supports. Hepatologists trained to identify AUD, alcohol-associated liver disease, and risk for AWS can proactively address these issues, ensuring that patients' AWS is managed safely and effectively and supporting planning for long-term recovery.

Sleep patterns, genetic predisposition, and risk of chronic liver disease: A prospective study of 408,560 UK Biobank participants.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the role that combined sleep behaviors play in the association with chronic liver disease (CLD) risk. METHODS: We included 408,560 participants initially free of CLD from the UK Biobank. A healthy sleep pattern was defined by early chronotype, sleep duration of 7-8 h/day, no insomnia, no snoring, and no excessive daytime sleepiness. Cox regression models were used to examine the association of healthy sleep pattern with incident CLD and their interaction with PNPLA3 genetic risk. RESULTS: During a median 12.5 years of follow-up, we documented 10,915 incident all-cause CLD cases, including 388 viral hepatitis, 4782 non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), 1356 cirrhosis, 973 alcoholic liver disease, and 725 liver cancer cases. Compared to participants with a healthy sleep score of 0-1, the hazard ratio (HR) (95 % confidence interval [CI]) for those with a sleep score of 5 was 0.54 (0.49, 0.60) for CLD, 0.52 (0.30, 0.90) for viral hepatitis, 0.47 (0.41, 0.55) for NAFLD, 0.57 (0.43, 0.75) for cirrhosis, 0.32 (0.23, 0.44) for alcoholic liver disease, and 0.53 (0.37, 0.77) for liver cancer. Healthy sleep pattern and PNPLA3 genetic risk exerted significant additive effects on CLD risk (relative excess risk due to the interaction: 0.05; attributable proportion due to the interaction: 13 %). LIMITATIONS: Measurement error was unavoidable for self-reported data on sleep behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses provide evidence that healthy sleep pattern was inversely associated with the development of CLD, and participants with higher genetic risk were more likely to develop CLD when exposed to the unhealthy sleep pattern.

Patients with early-stage alcohol-associated liver disease are at increased risk of hospital readmission and death.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) can develop alcohol-associated fatty liver disease (AFLD). However, the impact of AFLD on outcomes remains unclear. We studied the impact of AFLD on readmission, 30-day mortality, and overall mortality in patients admitted with AUD. METHODS: Hospitalized patients with AUD between 2011 and 2019 at a tertiary medical center were retrospectively evaluated. Our population included patients with AUD with AFLD: AST and ALT elevation and serum bilirubin <3 mg/dl. Patients with AUD without evidence of liver disease served as control and were labeled as no ALD. Patients with alcohol-associated cirrhosis (AC) and alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) were included for comparison. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable regression for predictors of mortality and survival were performed. RESULTS: There were 7522 patients of which 32.44% were female with mean age of 51.86 ±â€…14.41 years. Patient distribution included no ALD (n = 3775), AFLD (n = 2192), AC (n = 1017) and AH (n = 538) groups. Compared to no ALD group, AFLD group was associated with significantly higher 30-day mortality [4.43% vs. 1.56%, hazard ratio (HR): 2.84; P  < 0.001], overall mortality [15.97% vs. 12.69%, HR 1.40, P  < 0.001], and 30-day readmission [21.85% vs. 18.49%, odds ratio: 1.21; P  < 0.01]. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that AFLD is not a benign entity and poses significant mortality risk. Our results suggest that AFLD may be under-recognized and highlight the need for focused management and close follow-up after discharge.

Prognostic Factors in Alcohol-associated Liver Disease Patients Presenting With First Evidence of Ascites.

GOALS: To identify factors associated with transplantation and death in alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) patients presenting with first evidence of ascites. BACKGROUND: Ascites development is a poor prognostic sign for patients with cirrhosis. Among ALD patients, the baseline factors at time of ascites development that are associated with eventual transplantation or death are currently unknown. STUDY: Adult patients with ascites in the "Evaluating Alcohol Use in Alcohol-related Liver Disease Prospective Cohort Study" (NCT03267069 clinicaltrials.gov) were identified from 2016 to 2020. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory factors at initial ascites presentation were identified as potential predictors of transplant and death as competing risks. RESULTS: A total of 96 patients were identified. Median (interquartile range) follow-up time was 2.00 years (0.87 to 3.85). By last follow-up, 34/96 patients had been transplanted (35.4%) and 11/96 had died (11.4%). Prognostic factors for transplant included age per decade [hazard ratio (HR): 0.52 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.83)], employed status [HR: 0.35 (95% CI, 0.14 to 0.90)], and sodium [HR: 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90 to 0.99)], whereas prognostic factors for death were body mass index [HR: 1.11 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.22)], Charlson index [HR: 2.14 [95% CI, 1.13 to 4.08]), Maddrey Discriminant Function >32 (HR: 5.88 (95% CI, 1.18, 29.39)], aspartate aminotransferase [HR: 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98 to 0.997)], and a prior 12-month abstinence period [HR: 5.53 (95% CI, 1.10 to 27.83)], adjusted for age, sex, and ALD subcategory. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors at initial ascites presentation are associated with increased risk of transplantation or death and validation in larger cohorts will allow for improved risk stratification for ALD patients.

Alcohol use disorder in alcohol-associated liver disease: Two sides of the same coin.

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) has emerged as the leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide, with 40% of LTs in the United States performed for ALD in 2019. The ALD-related health care burden accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in young individuals. Alcohol use disorder (AUD), which focuses on the negative effects of alcohol on psychosocial, physical, and mental health, is present in the majority of patients with ALD, with moderate to severe AUD in 75%-80%. During the last decade, early liver transplantation (eLT) has emerged as a lifesaving treatment for selected patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis; these patients may have a higher risk of using alcohol after LT. The risk of alcohol use recurrence may be reduced during the pretransplant or post-transplant period with AUD treatment using behavioral and/or pharmacological therapies and with regular monitoring for alcohol use (self-reported and complemented with biomarkers like phosphatidylethanol). However, AUD treatment in patients with ALD is challenging due to patient, clinician, and system barriers. An integrated model to provide AUD and ALD care by hepatologists and addiction experts in a colocated clinic starting from LT evaluation and selection to monitoring listed candidates and then to following up on recipients of LT should be promoted. However, the integration of addiction and hepatology teams in an LT program in the real world is often present only during evaluation and candidate selection for LT. Data are emerging to show that a multidisciplinary integrated AUD treatment within an LT program reduces recurrent alcohol use after LT. If we want to continue using early liver transplantation for patients with severe alcohol-associated hepatitis, LT programs should focus on building integrated multidisciplinary care teams for the integrated treatment of both AUD and ALD.

Alcohol Use in Liver Transplant Recipients With Alcohol-related Liver Disease: A Comparative Assessment of Relapse Prediction Models.

BACKGROUND: The selection of liver transplant (LT) candidates with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is influenced by the risk of alcohol relapse (AR), yet the ability to predict AR is limited. We evaluate psychosocial factors associated with post-LT AR and compare the performance of high-risk alcoholism risk (HRAR), sustained alcohol use post-LT (SALT), and the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) scores in predicting relapse. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ALD patients undergoing LT from 2015 to 2021 at a single US transplant center was performed. Risk factors associated with post-LT AR were evaluated and test characteristics of 3 prediction models were compared. RESULTS: Of 219 ALD LT recipients, 23 (11%) had AR during a median study follow-up of 37.5 mo. On multivariate analysis, comorbid psychiatric illness (odds ratio 5.22) and continued alcohol use after advice from a health care provider (odds ratio 3.8) were found to be significantly associated with post-LT AR. On sensitivity analysis, SIPAT of 30 was optimal on discriminating between ALD LT recipients with and without post-LT AR. SIPAT outperformed both the HRAR and SALT scores (c-statistic 0.67 versus 0.59 and 0.62, respectively) in identifying post-LT AR. However, all scores had poor positive predictive value (<25%). CONCLUSIONS: AR after LT is associated with comorbid psychiatric illness and lack of heeding health care provider advice to abstain from alcohol. Although SIPAT outperformed the HRAR and SALT scores in predicting AR, all are poor predictors. The current tools to predict post-LT AR should not be used to exclude LT candidacy.

Non-invasive markers of inflammation in alcohol-associated liver disease: A scoping review.

Clinical manifestations of liver inflammation in alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) can range from asymptomatic to severe alcoholic hepatitis. While biopsy is the gold standard for identifying liver inflammation, it is an invasive procedure with risks of bleeding, visceral damage, and infection. We aim to establish the state of the current literature on non-invasive markers of inflammation in ALD. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for original studies on the association between one or more non-invasive biomarker(s) and histological inflammation or hepatitis in ALD patients. Exclusion criteria were lack of histological data, abstract only, non-English-language articles, and animal studies. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts, reviewed full texts, and extracted data from included papers. Our search identified 8051 unique studies. Title and abstract screening resulted in 563 studies, and full-text screening resulted in 31 studies for final inclusion. The majority were single-center observational cohorts with an average sample size of 124. Review of these studies identified 44 unique biomarkers and 8 calculated scores associated with histological inflammation and/or hepatitis, in addition to a metabolomic panel of 468 metabolites. Six studies examined diagnostic accuracy for histological inflammation and/or hepatitis. The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.932 using a model based on four metabolites. This review highlights the available literature on non-invasive markers of inflammation in ALD. There is a dearth of studies that evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers, and larger studies are needed to confirm findings identified in small cohorts.

Circulating cytokines and alcoholic liver disease: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: Increased inflammation in the liver during ethanol exposure is a major feature of alcoholic liver disease (ALD). An important contributing component to the development of ALD is the inflammatory response brought on by immunological response, however the connection between individual circulating cytokines and ALD is still unclear. To ascertain the causation, we conducted a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization research. METHODS: We extracted 41 cytokines and growth factors of 8293 Europeans and ALD cases of the same ethnicity (1416 cases and 217,376 controls) from the Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) database for two-sample bidirectional MR analysis. RESULTS: Our analyses suggest that higher interleukin-7 (IL-7) levels are associated with an increased risk of ALD (p = 0.028, OR = 1.191,95% CI = 1.019-1.392), while tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a protective factor for ALD (p = 0.032, OR = 0.863, 95% CI = 0.754-0.988) which can reduce the risk of disease occurrence. In addition, genetically predicted ALD does not affect the expression of circulating cytokines regulators. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports that cytokines play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of ALD. To determine the mechanisms and pathways of action of these biomarkers, further basic research is required to ensure their clinical suitability for preventing and treating ALD.

Dual alcohol and metabolic-related liver disease: Results from a population of liver transplant patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: If alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are now the two main indications for liver transplantation (LT), it has been recognized that both conditions can coexist in varying degrees and the concept of dual-aetiology fatty liver disease (DAFLD) has been proposed. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate, in a cohort of patients transplanted for ALD and NAFLD, the prevalence of DAFLD before LT and the impact on liver graft outcome. METHODS: From 1990 to 2010, all patients who underwent LT for the so-called ALD or NAFLD in our centre were included. Before LT, DAFLD was defined as patients with a history of excessive alcohol consumption and obesity associated with either diabetes or hypertension. Before LT, patients were separated into three groups: DAFLD, ALD, and NAFLD. Fatty liver graft disease was classified according to the FLIP algorithm. RESULTS: Out of 907, adult LT recipients were identified: 33 DAFLD patients, 333 ALD patients, and 24 NAFLD patients. After LT, ALD patients experienced significantly more alcohol relapse than DAFLD patients, who had twice more post-LT metabolic syndrome. Out of 926, post-LT biopsies, DAFLD patients had significantly more fatty liver graft disease due to metabolic syndrome features than ALD patients. CONCLUSION: Our results support that DAFLD recently emerged as an indication of LT. In the future, this particular population needs to be identified as a specific entity since post-LT outcome on the graft is different from ALD and more similar to NAFLD patients.

Recent Advances in Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cell-Based Therapy for Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represent pathological conditions that include many distinct stages, potentially leading to the final stage of cirrhotic liver. To date, liver transplantation is the sole successful treatment with concomitant limitations related to donor organ shortage and the need of life-long immunosuppressive therapy. Recently, cell-based therapies for ALD and NAFLD have been proposed with mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) as promising effectors. MSC therapeutic applications offer hepatoprotection, regulation of the inflammatory process and angiogenesis particularly in ALD and NAFLD pre-clinical disease models. Recent studies suggested that hepatospecific MSC-based therapies could benefit liver diseases by restoring liver function and decreasing inflammation and fibrosis. Similarly to solid-organ transplantation, limitations in MSC approaches include donor availability exacerbated by high number of cells and cell trapping into lungs. Herein, based on recent advances, we discuss the use of MSCs as a therapeutic approach for ALD and NAFLD and we provide the available information for the establishment of a framework toward a potential clinical application.

Outcomes of re-referrals of patients with alcohol-associated liver disease, who were previously declined for liver transplantation.

Since 2018, our program has utilized specific psychosocial criteria and a multidisciplinary approach to assess patients for liver transplant due to alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), rather than the 6-month abstinence rule alone. If declined based on these criteria, specific recommendations are provided to patients and their providers regarding goals for re-referral to increase the potential for future transplant candidacy. Recommendations include engagement in treatment for alcohol use disorder, serial negative biomarker testing, and maintenance of abstinence from alcohol. In our current study, we evaluate the outcomes of patients with ALD, who were initially declined upon assessment and re-referred to our program. This is a retrospective cohort study that includes 98 patients with ALD, who were previously declined for liver transplantation and were subsequently re-referred for liver transplant assessment between May 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. We assess the outcomes of patients who were re-referred including acceptance for transplantation following a second assessment. Of the 98 patients who were re-referred, 46 (46.9%) fulfilled the recommendations made and proceeded to further medical evaluation. Nine were eventually transplanted; others are listed and are waiting for transplant. The presence of a partner was independently associated with a higher rate of acceptance (OR 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.97, p = 0.05). Most of the patients who did not proceed further (n = 52) were declined again due to ALD contraindications (n = 33, 63.4%), including ongoing drinking and lack of engagement in recommended addiction treatment. Others had medical contraindications (11.2%), clinically improved (6.1%), had adherence issues (5.1%), or lack of adequate support (2%). Patients with ALD previously declined for a liver transplant can be re-referred and successfully accepted for transplantation by fulfilling the recommendations made by the multidisciplinary team. Important factors including ongoing abstinence, engagement in addiction treatment, and social support are key for successful acceptance.